Two previously blocked natural gas pipeline projects, the Constitution and Northeast Supply Enhancement, are being revived by pipeline operator Williams Companies. The decision marks a major reversal, spurred by a renewed push from the Trump administration to fast-track fossil fuel infrastructure. Thegas pipeline projects, originally denied permits over environmental concerns by New York officials, are now back on the table amid shifting political winds.
This development follows the Trump administration’s approval of the Empire Wind project after extensive lobbying by New York Governor Kathy Hochul. Although she did not explicitly endorse new pipelines, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum later stated that Hochul had shown a “willingness to move forward on critical pipeline capacity.”
The Constitution pipeline would span over 100 miles from northeastern Pennsylvania to Albany, while the Northeast Supply Enhancement project is a shorter, underwater route from New Jersey to New York City. Williams, based in Tulsa, Oklahoma, confirmed it has reopened discussions with state officials and has requested the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission reinstate a previously issued permit. The company aims to have the pipeline operational by late 2027.
Energy Demand Meets Environmental Tensions
New York and New England rely heavily on natural gas for electricity after phasing out coal-fired plants, yet suffer from some of the highest utility rates in the country. Limited pipeline capacity from Pennsylvania’s Marcellus shale has constrained supply, prompting calls from the gas industry for more infrastructure to stabilize prices. A study by S&P Global found that expanding pipeline capacity could cut gas prices in the Northeast by 20% to 30%, especially in winter.
Williams argues that gas pipeline projects are critical to meeting energy demands while reducing reliance on higher-emission fuels like fuel oil. CEO Alan Armstrong stated that mounting consumer frustration over high utility bills could shift public and political opinion toward supporting new pipelines.
However, environmental advocates and many Democratic lawmakers maintain firm opposition. They argue that expanding natural gas infrastructure undermines climate goals and diverts attention from renewable energy investments. Assemblywoman Anna Kelles of Ithaca urged state leaders to pursue alternative strategies, including energy efficiency measures and utility bill caps. She also called for faster implementation of a state program designed to curb greenhouse gas emissions.
Political Stakes and Uncertain Future
Governor Hochul has acknowledged the economic impact of rising energy costs, framing the pipeline debate within the broader context of affordability. With her reelection on the horizon and voter discontent over living costs growing, she has prioritized tax relief and pushed back against utility rate hikes.
Yet even with the Trump administration’s backing, Williams faces significant obstacles. Financing will depend on securing long-term gas contracts, something less certain in a state aggressively transitioning to cleaner energy. Each pipeline could cost nearly $1 billion to build, and long-term demand remains in question.
Legal and community resistance also looms. Environmental groups such as the Natural Resources Defense Council have vowed renewed opposition. “These gas pipeline projects will once again be met with stiff and deep resistance,” said NRDC strategist Mark Izeman, predicting protracted legal battles if the projects move forward.
Explore More News In Our Oil Gas Energy Magazine
